Love has got to do with commitment. If one who does not commit to its own future significant other, what is the use of planning for future family? What is the use of having a partner? What is the use of loving others? Do not ever think that people will love you more than you love others. Do not ever think that people will adore you more than how your parents do. Come to think of it, if your parents could actually sacrifice everything, be it time, money and effort onto you, why couldn't you learn from your parents and be a good example to others?

I always believe love occurred between the two parties. Love can only be recognized through action. I strongly agree with this statement, “Action Speaks Louder Than Words”. We can say everything we want, we can say how much we love our significant other, we can say how much we dislike certain things, but ultimately, whether your statement make senses or whether is it true, links back to your action.

Action portraits your thoughts. Action expresses your feeling. Action tells someone whether you are satisfied with certain things. When your significant ones fall ill, you would definitely bring him or her to see a doctor. When your significant ones feel lonely, no matter how busy you are, you would always set aside some time for him. When your significant ones delight, you cheer for him. When you significant ones feels sad, you would lend him a pair of listening ears and a comfortable shoulders to lean on. Your significant ones love you and I believe through these actions, it is more than enough. You could even save up your energy to say “I Love You, Darling.” You could even minimize the SMS usage within the limits.

“Love is not about religion, Love is not about Scientific Theory, Love is about both of US…and I Love You.”


Group sets up site urging Singapore to keep gay sex ban
Channel NewsAsia - Friday, October 19

SINGAPORE: In an apparent counter move, a group calling itself "the Majority" has set up a website to collect signatures backing a call for the government to keep the law against gay sex.

The group, in an open letter to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, asks the government to "do what is right and retain Section 377A for the future of our children and our nation".

Under Section 377A of the Penal Code, it is illegal for men to have sex with one another. While prosecution is rare, those convicted can be jailed up to two years.

The online letter read: "Section 377A is a reflection of the sentiments of the majority of society. Most Singaporeans hold conservative family values and do not accept homosexuality as the norm.

"Repealing Section 377A is a vehicle to force homosexuality on a conservative population that is not ready for homosexuality."

Repealing the law, the letter said, could lead to the redefinition of same—sex marriage and the trend of adoption by same—sex parents.

The website, which went live yesterday at about 12.30pm, seems to be a response to an ongoing public online campaign calling for Section 377A to be repealed even sporting a similar website design.

The pro—repeal website is urging people to sign two documents, one an open letter to the Prime Minister and the second a petition which closes today to be submitted to Parliament on Monday by Nominated Member of Parliament Siew Kum Hong.

In the latest Penal Code review, which was finished last month, the government decided to uphold the status quo on this issue. The Ministry of Home Affairs had said that Singapore was generally a conservative society and "we should let the situation evolve".

As of 10.45pm yesterday, the website in support of Section 377A had gathered 118 signatures, most of which were accompanied by comments. Wrote a petitioner who signed off as "Bo Bo": "We should never submit to what the rest of the world finds trendy and acceptable."

Wrote Sammy, another petitioner: "It is not right to alter the Section 377A which (sic) majority stands for traditional family values which built what Singapore is today."

Mr Martin Tan, 30, who organised this latest online show of support for Section 377A, told TODAY the website allowed the "silent majority" to have its say.

"What the gay community does in private is their private space," said Mr Tan, an executive director of a not—for—profit organisation. "We just do not want our country’s legislation to change just for a small minority who are vocal."

The pro—Section 377A group, said Mr Tan, was started by a small group of four "concerned individuals" who forwarded the link to friends. The open letter, he added, will remain on the website and not be submitted to the government.

When contacted, organisers of the online letter and the petition against Section 377A declined to comment on the new website. But they did say the petition to Parliament had garnered 2,519 signatures so far.

Gay rights activist Alex Au saw the new website as Singaporeans exercising free speech. But as for the group calling itself "the Majority", he said the matter was not a "numbers game" but an issue of "fairness and equality".

Saying the latest website reflected "healthy" debate, Dr Gillian Koh, senior research fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies, said the scene should not be "monopolised" by those who want the law repealed.

For those who want it retained, she added, "it’s a way to signal to other Singaporeans that a bunch of them care about this issue too".

However, Dr Koh also believed that despite several surveys showing that most Singaporeans feel homosexuality should not be made legal, most would choose to stay out of discussion remaining as "spectators" only.

"What will happen is that people from the religious backgrounds, those with clear vested interests, will speak up," said Dr Koh.








Life is full of surprises. Life is an enjoyment. Life is a living thing. Life gives you encouragement. Life gives you motivation. Life tells you what is right and wrong. Life allows you to see a vision. Life leads you to another level. Life enables you to experience new skills. There are always ups and downs throughout the Life Journey. When situation is favorable to Life, Life builds up the atmosphere. When an unusual change of climate occurred, Life detected danger. Life can be strong. Life can be weak. Surrounding temperature and environment determines Lifespan. One who is strong supports the weak and the weak shall receive treatment to aid injury. Life is not solid. Nor it is a liquid. Life is a form of gas. When Life diffuse into the open air, it lifts up the whole atmosphere, brighten up another Life, producing a sweet smelling fragrance. Life is like a certain volume of perfume. Its aroma serves as a therapy to others. Life is full of wonders. Life is everywhere. Life is in You…


A Question Of Origins
I happened to watch a very knowledgeable video from http://www.youtube.com/ and somehow it caught my attention. Not to doubt any hypothesis but i'm curious to know more...

(1)A big bang "BOO!" in the galaxy and there you have, Evolution Theory... Hence, we have Sun, Stars, Earth etc....

1. Is it true?
2. Can anyone prove it?
3. Where is the evidence?

(2)Or is it the Creator whom created Earth in the beginning? [Genesis 1:1]

• 2Timothy 1:8,9
• Psalms102:25
• Isaiah 45:18
• Psalms19:1-3

(3)Chemical Evolution produces Life?

*Do take note that they might be a possibility of having wrong material used, wrong conditions, thus giving wrong results..*

(4)Can energy or heat create new Life?